Animal Rights – Animal Rights Cafe http://animalrightscafe.com/ Tue, 19 Oct 2021 19:51:34 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://animalrightscafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/icon-6-150x150.png Animal Rights – Animal Rights Cafe http://animalrightscafe.com/ 32 32 10/19/2021 | In a first decision, the court sides with PETA in an advertising case https://animalrightscafe.com/10-19-2021-in-a-first-decision-the-court-sides-with-peta-in-an-advertising-case/ https://animalrightscafe.com/10-19-2021-in-a-first-decision-the-court-sides-with-peta-in-an-advertising-case/#respond Tue, 19 Oct 2021 17:37:44 +0000 https://animalrightscafe.com/10-19-2021-in-a-first-decision-the-court-sides-with-peta-in-an-advertising-case/ Council votes for public censorship of Paddack on comments; Defensive advisor, challenges his colleagues OCEAN CITY – Ocean City City Council voted on Monday to publicly censor a colleague for inappropriate comments on a local resident’s social media page. The issue arose in mid-September when City Councilor Mark Paddack reportedly commented on a Facebook story […]]]>

Council votes for public censorship of Paddack on comments; Defensive advisor, challenges his colleagues

OCEAN CITY – Ocean City City Council voted on Monday to publicly censor a colleague for inappropriate comments on a local resident’s social media page. The issue arose in mid-September when City Councilor Mark Paddack reportedly commented on a Facebook story of a recently married woman while the couple were on their honeymoon in Italy. On a photo of …

Learn more ”

Community celebrates Henry Park redesign and new basketball court mural

Community celebrates Henry Park redesign and new basketball court mural

BERLIN – Residents of all ages descended on Henry Park on Sunday to gather to celebrate the newly renovated basketball courts. The courts, now a brightly painted mural, were christened with hours of one-on-one and three-on-three play to community applause on Sunday. Elected officials and an estimated area of ​​1,500…

Learn more ”

176-unit townhouse community proposed for Berlin off Route 50

176-unit townhouse community proposed for Berlin off Route 50

BERLIN – City officials want to know what the public thinks of a proposed townhouse development in the area of ​​routes 818 and 50. A developer met with the Berlin Town Planning Commission this week to discuss plans for a 176 unit townhouse community at the northwest intersection of Route 818 and Route 50 westbound. Commission …

Learn more ”

Governor proposes early planning funds for Highway 90 widening

Governor proposes early planning funds for Highway 90 widening

OCEAN CITY – Perhaps the biggest takeaway from the State Highway Administration (SHA) briefing to station officials this week on pending projects was that the Route 90 dualisation is now firmly in the planning pipeline. . On Tuesday, SHA officials briefed the mayor and council on a variety of projects in various stages of planning or completion …

Learn more ”


Source link

]]>
https://animalrightscafe.com/10-19-2021-in-a-first-decision-the-court-sides-with-peta-in-an-advertising-case/feed/ 0
Hearing held on the future of the Muskegon Wolfdog Sanctuary https://animalrightscafe.com/hearing-held-on-the-future-of-the-muskegon-wolfdog-sanctuary/ https://animalrightscafe.com/hearing-held-on-the-future-of-the-muskegon-wolfdog-sanctuary/#respond Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:40:49 +0000 https://animalrightscafe.com/hearing-held-on-the-future-of-the-muskegon-wolfdog-sanctuary/ MUSKEGON, Mich .– A judge in Muskegon heard testimony Monday morning regarding what should happen to the animals currently living at the Howling Timbers Animal Shelter. Howling Timbers Animal Sanctuary owner Brenda Pearson appeared before Judge Annette R. Smedley at 9:30 a.m. Monday for a forfeiture hearing regarding the 47 wolf dogs in their custody. […]]]>

MUSKEGON, Mich .– A judge in Muskegon heard testimony Monday morning regarding what should happen to the animals currently living at the Howling Timbers Animal Shelter.

Howling Timbers Animal Sanctuary owner Brenda Pearson appeared before Judge Annette R. Smedley at 9:30 a.m. Monday for a forfeiture hearing regarding the 47 wolf dogs in their custody.

Pearson is currently facing civil and criminal charges related to wolfdogs on his property.

In 2020, Michigan DNR officers served a search warrant at the sanctuary after learning of reports that a child and volunteer were injured by a wolfdog.

During the execution of this warrant, two fawns, six red foxes, three coyotes and four box turtles were removed from Howling Timbers. According to the DNR, they were not duly authorized to house the animals.

They also found 47 wolfdogs living there at the time, claiming they were also not allowed to house them.

In court on Monday, during a confiscation hearing in the civil In this case, the prosecution claimed that the sanctuary had not been properly authorized to house wolfhounds since 2018.

A defense attorney for Pearson and her husband on Monday asked Judge Smedley for more time before proceeding to the hearing, saying they did not have enough time to review the prosecution’s evidence.

Justice Smedley denied their request and the forfeiture hearing continued.

The prosecution showed several photos of injuries allegedly caused by wolfdogs living at Howling Timbers.

One of those photos appeared to show an arm with open wounds, detached from a body, which prosecutors said had been torn off by a wolfdog.

Pearson’s defense attorney said it was Pearson’s young granddaughter who had her arm torn off by one of the wolfhounds. They also admitted that a staff member was injured by a wolfdog after entering one of their enclosures.

Prosecutors, in response, claimed at least 4 people had been injured by wolfdogs in recent years at Howling Timbers.

Pearson also faces criminal charges following the 2020 MNR investigation. She faces one count of dangerous animal causing serious injury and a violation of the Wolf Dog Cross Act.

The trial date for these charges has not yet been set.

Pearson started the shrine in the early 1990s.

The state of Michigan permitted the keeping of wolfdogs in residential homes until 2000, when the laws were changed. After this point, all wolfhounds in the state were to be in the care of a properly licensed sanctuary.

“It was never really meant to be that big, it was never meant to last that long. They started with a few wolfhounds. It was kind of a personal thing,” said one of the Brenda’s granddaughters at FOX 17 during a visit to the shrine in December 2019.

Howling Timbers posted on his Facebook page on October 14: “We have held back from making a public comment, but not anymore. The trial for the confiscation of all our animals continues on Monday. There are no sanctuaries for all of our animals, the DNR does not have a placement, so the Muskegon County District Attorney is forcing the deaths of all of our animals IF THE PLACEMENT IS NOT OBTAINED. The blood of our beloved animals is in the hands of the Attorney General, DNR and MDARD. It is an atrocity of the first magnitude!

This post has been shared over 1000 times.

After starting to gain momentum on social media, the Muskegon County District Attorney’s Office released its own statement on Friday, October 15, stating in part: “There have been false information and allegations made about social media about an ongoing legal case involving animals in the care of a local defendant in Muskegon County. Our office supports animal rights and supports the ethical and legal treatment of animals. Our office will continue to advocate for safe, legal and appropriate care for all animals, including wolves and mixed wolf-dog breeds. We believe that all animals deserve proper care and will do everything in our power to achieve this goal. “


Source link

]]>
https://animalrightscafe.com/hearing-held-on-the-future-of-the-muskegon-wolfdog-sanctuary/feed/ 0
EDUCATION BEAT: Saint Francis of Assisi and you and me | Local News https://animalrightscafe.com/education-beat-saint-francis-of-assisi-and-you-and-me-local-news/ https://animalrightscafe.com/education-beat-saint-francis-of-assisi-and-you-and-me-local-news/#respond Sun, 17 Oct 2021 08:00:00 +0000 https://animalrightscafe.com/education-beat-saint-francis-of-assisi-and-you-and-me-local-news/ “Preach the gospel at all times. When necessary; use words. (This is how I strive to live. Yes, I fail. Constantly. Notice I used the word ‘s ‘strive.’) “By giving, we receive. (Again, this is something I strive to experience on a daily basis. And it is also a lot of fun! No wonder Saint […]]]>

“Preach the gospel at all times. When necessary; use words. (This is how I strive to live. Yes, I fail. Constantly. Notice I used the word ‘s ‘strive.’)

“By giving, we receive. (Again, this is something I strive to experience on a daily basis. And it is also a lot of fun! No wonder Saint Francis is supposedly filled with constant inner joy. I understand. hope you too, my friends.)

“All the darkness in the world cannot extinguish the light of one candle.” (Yes, I am a believer. Even during my darkest bouts of depression, I somehow knew that a light was there, whether I could see it or not.)

“It is by forgiving that we are forgiven. (I have personally discovered, time and time again in my life, that forgiveness frees my mind in ways that revenge can never come close.)

François chose to live near the poor and even voluntarily became poor, to better understand their plight. (I can certainly understand.)

Due to his different ways and ideas, Francis was sometimes considered eccentric, even foolish. (Again, I can understand. The times I’ve been called an idiot and an eccentric might outnumber the remaining hairs on my head.)

Like Saint Francis, Native American tribes also developed an extremely deep attachment to all animals. They too called the animals siblings. Literally. Like Saint Francis.


Source link

]]>
https://animalrightscafe.com/education-beat-saint-francis-of-assisi-and-you-and-me-local-news/feed/ 0
Carole Baskin gets her own TV show: get the details https://animalrightscafe.com/carole-baskin-gets-her-own-tv-show-get-the-details/ https://animalrightscafe.com/carole-baskin-gets-her-own-tv-show-get-the-details/#respond Fri, 15 Oct 2021 22:00:26 +0000 https://animalrightscafe.com/carole-baskin-gets-her-own-tv-show-get-the-details/ Carole Baskin is a well known internet sensation. His fame was brought by the Netflix Original King tiger. In King tiger, she was the animal rights activist who was Joe Exotic’s nemesis. This 60-year-old woman had many fans of the show who hated her for being the villain of the show. As Tiger King followed […]]]>

Carole Baskin is a well known internet sensation. His fame was brought by the Netflix Original King tiger. In King tiger, she was the animal rights activist who was Joe Exotic’s nemesis. This 60-year-old woman had many fans of the show who hated her for being the villain of the show. As Tiger King followed Joseph Maldonado-Passage, better known as Joe Exotic, who was in charge of the Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park, he showed a glimpse into the life of Carole Baskin as she introduced herself as a human rights activist. animal rights.

Carole Baskin was in her late teens when she started raising and saving cats. His fame of the show King tiger came about due to a rumor that she was involved in the sudden disappearance of her second husband. Her second husband, Don Lewis, was declared legally dead in 2002 and fans of King tiger had many questions about his sudden and mysterious disappearance. Baskin denied having anything to do with the situation. After the show ended, fans still had so many questions.

No more “dangerous operators”

It was announced that there would be a second King tiger upcoming series on Netflix. This sequel to the original would not include Carole Baskin. How would fans get the shutdown? They had so many questions about this alleged animal rights activist. Instead, Carole will be releasing her own series on Discovery + called Carole Baskin’s cage fight. In this series, Carole Baskin and her husband Howard will take a look at the treatment of rare animals at Joe Exotic’s former zoo. According to Discovery +, this series will quickly get down to business. This will put Carole Baskin in direct confrontation with “dangerous operators”.

Animal Planet got the last interview with Joe Exotic. Photo credit: Animal Planet

Blood is not thicker than water?

In Carole Baskin’s cage fight, she goes work with Joe Exotic’s niece, Chealsi. Chealsi was employed at Joe’s Zoo when she was younger. Using Chealsi’s inner knowledge, Baskin will try to find the animal remains. These remains will be used against Joe Exotic as evidence. Not only that, but she will also go beyond the GW Zoo to search for evidence of illegal zoo visits. A Hollywood reporter said that “an investigation into a shady roadside zoo will lead the production to a showdown with a drug dealer in Miami.” Looks like this series is a wild ride!

This is a unique opportunity for fans of King tiger to preview Carole Baskin’s version of the story while watching her expose people for mistreating animals. “This is our real life job in a dangerous world, and viewers will see our people under threat, guns pointed at us and bad guys firing at our drones,” said Carole Baskin. While Baskin’s new series may not be as reality TV based as King tiger was, fans of the show will likely enjoy watching this one as well. Will you watch Carole Baskin’s cage fight on Discovery +?

Latest posts by Mandy Robinson (see everything)


Source link

]]>
https://animalrightscafe.com/carole-baskin-gets-her-own-tv-show-get-the-details/feed/ 0
Update: Court Orders Roadside Zoo To Pay Thousands More To PETA https://animalrightscafe.com/update-court-orders-roadside-zoo-to-pay-thousands-more-to-peta/ https://animalrightscafe.com/update-court-orders-roadside-zoo-to-pay-thousands-more-to-peta/#respond Thu, 14 Oct 2021 20:16:54 +0000 https://animalrightscafe.com/update-court-orders-roadside-zoo-to-pay-thousands-more-to-peta/ For immediate release:October 14, 2021 Contact:David Perlé 202-483-7382 Cumberland, Maryland – PETA just scored yet another victory in its successful federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) lawsuit against Tri-State Zoological Park and associates: The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has now granted PETA’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection […]]]>

For immediate release:
October 14, 2021

Contact:
David Perlé 202-483-7382

Cumberland, Maryland – PETA just scored yet another victory in its successful federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) lawsuit against Tri-State Zoological Park and associates: The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has now granted PETA’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection with the Tri-State appeal, which it has lost earlier this year. The court order included the full amount requested by PETA – $ 57,949.28 – and follows a previous order for fees and costs issued by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, bringing the total amount that Tri-State owes to PETA at $ 114,605.05.

Meanwhile, PETA and concerned citizen Constance Collins are pursuing yet another lawsuit arguing that Tri-State’s documented failure to provide animals with adequate veterinary care, proper food, clean water and more. necessities violate state law and constitute a public nuisance. PETA’s goal is to get every animal out of Tri-State and place them in appropriate facilities where they would finally receive the attention of animal care experts.

PETA – whose motto says, in part, that “animals are not ours for entertainment” – opposes speciesism, a worldview of human supremacy. For more information on PETA’s information gathering and investigative reporting, please visitPETA.orgor follow the group onTwitter,Facebook, WhereInstagram.



Source link

]]>
https://animalrightscafe.com/update-court-orders-roadside-zoo-to-pay-thousands-more-to-peta/feed/ 0
National Trust unnecessarily instigates ‘anti-revival’ campaign | Simon jenkins https://animalrightscafe.com/national-trust-unnecessarily-instigates-anti-revival-campaign-simon-jenkins/ https://animalrightscafe.com/national-trust-unnecessarily-instigates-anti-revival-campaign-simon-jenkins/#respond Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:41:00 +0000 https://animalrightscafe.com/national-trust-unnecessarily-instigates-anti-revival-campaign-simon-jenkins/ The National Trust has more members than all UK political parties combined. It is certain that these five and a half million members will not agree on anything. This is why the management of the Trust has long considered that, on any political issue which does not directly concern it, silence is the wisest policy. […]]]>

The National Trust has more members than all UK political parties combined. It is certain that these five and a half million members will not agree on anything. This is why the management of the Trust has long considered that, on any political issue which does not directly concern it, silence is the wisest policy.

Today, however, even the word “concern” is controversial. No body straddling the landscape of English history can expect to be completely immune from today’s cultural wars. The Trust has no longer been able to avoid past disputes over deer hunting, animal rights, global warming and the identity of gay owners. Hence the eruption of anger among some members at the decision taken last year by the Trust to reassess the colonial history of its properties.

The way these properties are presented will always be vulnerable to changing tastes and opinions. I have long thought that it was absurd not to mention the homosexuality of Lawrence of Arabia in the presentation of his refuge in Clouds Hill. Likewise, the Trust, with a long tradition of country sports, must trace a cautious furrow through the debates on fox hunting, the rewilding of the landscape and the grouse moors and peat bogs. Temperatures must be taken and compromises constantly sought.

I can see there was no way for the Trust to stay away from the debate on how to present controversial periods in British history. Its more than 300 properties are steeped in this history. Some houses, such as Dyrham and Speke Hall, were direct beneficiaries of slavery and their histories needed to be updated.

But if the Trust was right to revise its presentation, it was clearly a mistake to outsource such a sensitive topic to a group of partisan academics speaking private language that could only inflame the feelings of some members. The rewrites have apparently not been subject to peer review or editorial oversight. For example, slavery and empire are two very different issues. Thus, Churchill’s condemnation in his worldwide sanctuary of Chartwell – for his opposition to self-government in India – was childish and played into the hands of critics who knew thousands of members would support them.

The result has been to politicize the upcoming elections to the 36-member Trust Advisory Board, with a list of ‘anti-awakened’ conservatives. This body does not govern the Trust, which is the job of its Trustees. Indeed, the purpose of the council is precisely to debate controversial issues. Accordingly, using it as an exhaust valve in the current dispute will not be a bad thing. The council generally devotes more time to the birds, bees and badgers than to the opium wars.

As it stands, the National Trust is one of Britain’s largest charities, a successful, unsubsidized business with revenues of over £ 600million. It has been roughed up during the pandemic, but its budget is solid and the number of its members has reached six million. He will overcome this last dust – and learn.


Source link

]]>
https://animalrightscafe.com/national-trust-unnecessarily-instigates-anti-revival-campaign-simon-jenkins/feed/ 0
Get Off Your High Horses: Horse Abuse in Indian Weddings https://animalrightscafe.com/get-off-your-high-horses-horse-abuse-in-indian-weddings/ https://animalrightscafe.com/get-off-your-high-horses-horse-abuse-in-indian-weddings/#respond Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:16:25 +0000 https://animalrightscafe.com/get-off-your-high-horses-horse-abuse-in-indian-weddings/ Get Off Your High Horses: Horse Abuse in Indian Weddings Animal rights activists rally against the baraat with brutality A horse used in a Baarat procession in India (Photo / Adam Cohn) Before each wedding season in India, the demand for horses increases for a particular ritual which often becomes the backdrop for serious horse […]]]>

Get Off Your High Horses: Horse Abuse in Indian Weddings

Animal rights activists rally against the baraat with brutality

A horse used in a Baarat procession in India (Photo / Adam Cohn)

Before each wedding season in India, the demand for horses increases for a particular ritual which often becomes the backdrop for serious horse abuse, with the law often remaining ineffective and powerless in the face of animal cruelty.

As another wedding season begins in India, animal rights activist group PETA has created a sweet storm on Twitter in India with their viral tweet against a particular practice that is widespread in Indian weddings, but that is cruel and is often lost behind the glamor and noise of a wedding. In its tweet, People for Ethical Treatment of Animals, asks people to refrain from using marriage horses, calling it abusive and cruel.

Indeed, almost as a rule, Indian weddings feature the groom wearing a shiny wedding dress, adorned with jewels and a sword, astride a white horse. While most see the groom and his adornments in wedding photos and videos, few pay attention to the plight of the animal which is often severely malnourished and almost always severely abused and even abused.

For centuries, traditional Hindu-Indian weddings have used female horses to transport the groom from his house to the bride’s house, accompanied by relatives and friends in a traditional wedding procession called the “baarat”.

“A few hundred years ago, women were often kidnapped in their marriage by dacoits or members of a rival clan who appeared on horseback. Many horses were kept at the wedding venue to drive off the kidnappers. This is where the madness comes from, ”writes Meneka Gandhi, BJP leader and founder of one of India’s largest animal welfare organizations, People for Animals.

The baarat is believed to symbolize a royal journey of the groom to bring his bride home. However, unlike royal horses which are well fed and groomed with shiny skin, marriage horses are their poor cousins ​​who are rarely fed, beaten regularly and can barely walk, mainly due to the brutal and horrific treatment. in the hands of their masters.

Widespread abuse of marriage horses in India

“Horses are tough animals, but they need the right nutrition to stay fit and energetic. However, many horse handlers do not feed the animal at all for days. This makes the horses weak and less energetic, therefore easier to control, ”said Manish Kumar of Chiranji Lal Prajapati Band and Ghodi, a wedding orchestra and horse management company based in New Delhi. India Media Group.

Generally, wedding horses are forced to walk long distances without any rest, are fed unsuitable feeds often mandated by rituals, and are expected to remain calm despite loud music, bright lights, firecrackers as well as howling revelers. .

“As the horse could lose its calm because of these noises and lights, the keepers often try to get ahead of it and whip, chain, drug the animal, subjecting it to unspeakable tortures”, explains Kumar, owner of 2 female horses. . .

Kumar mentions that it can cost between 15,000 and 20,000 INR to properly maintain a horse, while local managers don’t save a dime over about 5,000 INR.

“What they spend monthly on a horse is still less than what they charge for a single horse. baarat procession that costs almost 7,000 to 10,000 INR, ”Kumar said.

“Handlers often stick spiked bits into the horse’s mouth to control them against pain. These torture devices are inserted into the mouths of horses and cause lacerations, injuries, swelling and bruising. When a spiked bit is inserted into a horse’s mouth daily, the injury only gets worse and cannot get better, ”said Khushboo Gupta, advocacy manager at PETA India. Media India Group.

She says many horses are malnourished, given substandard feed, limited access to water, and are housed in dirty stables without regular veterinarian supervision.

“Especially with horses that never see a vet, there is also the risk that they will transmit glanders, a deadly infectious zoonosis, to humans,” she adds.

Fair & Lovely: Wedding horses are no exception

It is reported that the horses that actually land in wedding processions are either old racehorses that no longer win at races, or those that are inbred due to their white color. Almost everyone wants a white mare as a horse for their wedding, but few know that white is a rare color among horses and in India there are very few breeds.

This leads to embezzlement of all kinds on the part of breeders and horse groomers to meet market demand. “The obsession with having a white wedding horse is such that requests are often met with embezzlement which includes the simple act of painting a horse white,” says Gauri Maulekhi, animal rights activist and one of the directors of People for Animals.

Maulekhi tells India Media Group that she finds the use of horses in wedding processions these days to be totally irrelevant, counterproductive and an unpleasant exercise. “In the national capital New Delhi, there is a place called Shadipur where a lot of horses are kept in very dirty and cramped conditions on overgrown land, but no one dares to say anything as they are being used. in wedding ceremonies. “

Indian law ill-equipped to deal with animal cruelty

Critics say not only does India not have an appropriate legal framework to protect animals from cruelty, but its implementation is so poor that in almost all cases animal mistreatment and abuse go unpunished.

The main law to protect animals is the Cruelty Prevention Act 1960, which aims to “prevent the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering on animals” and also provides for punishment for them.

It specifically bans the use of spiked tips and says that the use of a spiked tip will be punishable by up to imprisonment.

Maulekhi says the law is archaic. “The law is not very strict as the fine for cruelty to animals is only INR 50 and although technically the groom can be behind bars for up to 3 months but such convictions are unknown and this is probably the reason why violations are on the rise, ”she said.

“Refusing to use horses for ceremonies and weddings is the only sure way to end the suffering of these animals,” explains Gupta of PETA India.

She mentions that many wedding parties are now opting for animal-free transportation options, ranging from walking to arrival in a classic car or luxury bicycle, and even by helicopter.


Source link

]]>
https://animalrightscafe.com/get-off-your-high-horses-horse-abuse-in-indian-weddings/feed/ 0
Municipal shelter hides files based on animal ‘privacy’ rights | Opinion https://animalrightscafe.com/municipal-shelter-hides-files-based-on-animal-privacy-rights-opinion/ https://animalrightscafe.com/municipal-shelter-hides-files-based-on-animal-privacy-rights-opinion/#respond Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:30:00 +0000 https://animalrightscafe.com/municipal-shelter-hides-files-based-on-animal-privacy-rights-opinion/ In late April, the city of Memphis abruptly changed course and closed access to documents that show how the city-owned animal shelter treats the dogs and cats in its care. The map for making this decision is familiar to those of us in the public records community and gives food for thought to anyone who […]]]>

In late April, the city of Memphis abruptly changed course and closed access to documents that show how the city-owned animal shelter treats the dogs and cats in its care.

The map for making this decision is familiar to those of us in the public records community and gives food for thought to anyone who wants government to be open and accountable to its citizens.

It usually starts with someone in government who doesn’t want particular information in the files revealed. Then there is a call to someone in the government legal department, then another lawyer and another lawyer until a “case” can be presented to hold the cases.

It doesn’t matter if the reasoning undermines the Public Records Act, which the Tennessee Supreme Court said “plays a critical role in promoting accountability in government through public oversight of government activities.”

The result is that, little by little, the road traveled by some government lawyers nurtures and breeds a culture of occasional disregard for the transparency that citizens deserve and expect.

The only real option a citizen has in the face of this kind of defense of government secrecy is to hire a lawyer and take legal action to try to enforce a law that no one in government will enforce. And, as those who follow this path know, most citizens simply don’t have the time and money.

Here’s what happened in Memphis:

A citizen long-time involved with animal rescue groups in Memphis has requested records relating to a particular animal held by Memphis Animal Services (MAS). These included medical records which would show the treatment of the animal by the city-owned shelter.

But a few months earlier, the director of the animal service, Alexis Pugh, had asked the city’s legal department if such medical records could be withheld.

“The MAS sometimes receives very large requests for animal medical records from people who have no connection to animals, so they are very interested in knowing if there is a legal basis to withhold these records,” the city’s attorney wrote to the state’s Open Records Office. Counsel, an office created to help citizens and government understand the law on public records.

The city’s attorney was investigating whether state law that guarantees the confidentiality of human medical records could also be understood as allowing the city to deny access to animal medical records.

Lee Pope, attorney for the Office of Open Records Counsel (OORC), said “it doesn’t make sense that the provisions (in state law) governing patient records apply. to animal patients, ”but ultimately turned it over to the Tennessee Department. Health, which authorizes veterinarians and veterinary facilities.

Animals have the right to medical confidentiality, according to the state

Paige Edwards, a state health department attorney, told the Memphis Legal Department that animal medical records are not considered public records.

In the state’s view, as confirmed by an email sent to me, no distinction exists in law between human and non-human patients with respect to the privacy privilege of a patient. If you didn’t understand it: Dogs and cats have the same right as humans to keep their medical records private.

This was sufficient for the Memphis Legal Department, and Memphis Animal Services stopped responding to requests for public records that would show the medical treatment its vets were giving (or not giving) to the animals at its shelter.

“As of April 26, 2021, TDOH, in agreement with the OORC, has determined that animal medical records are exempt from disclosure…” Memphis Legal Department told Citizen in an email. (The legal department later said the euthanasia records could be released.)

For those concerned about these animals, it was a big blow.

Under a previous administration, the town-owned shelter was raided by the sheriff’s department as part of an animal cruelty investigation. People were fired and criminal charges were laid. The city has worked to change things. But now a new veil has been lifted to hide behind.

Are animals receiving appropriate medical care? Are they taking pain medication? Or are they left to suffer without her in cages until their date of euthanasia or until someone adopts them? Is the medical diagnosis of certain animals such that it would be more humane to euthanize rather than wait several days for a possible adoption?

And, perhaps more importantly, why does Memphis Animal Services want to hide this information now, after all these years?

Exploiting a Dog’s ‘Privacy’ to Hide the Treatment of a Shelter is Twisted

Memphis Animal Services has an expense budget of $ 4.45 million. In addition to funding from the city, it receives public donations.

Government officials like to control the message of their programs, so they deliver information when they want and in the context they want. The law on public archives works differently. Citizens have the right to access information contained in public archives, without filter. In this way, the Public Archives Act makes it possible to verify what government officials are saying.

Remarkably, despite the city’s new rationale that animal medical records are just as secret as human medical records, the Memphis shelter still gives medical information in mass emails to rescue groups, in the hope to find someone to adopt sick animals. But if a person asks for medical records on the animals to verify how the shelter treated the animals, the city says it doesn’t have to release them.

A record that documents how a municipal agency treats a dog or cat in its care is the type of public record that encourages accountability for government activities.

Harnessing a dog’s imaginary privacy right is a roundabout way to protect the government’s treatment of that dog.

Whose privacy are we protecting? Who do we keep secrets from? That of the dog or that of the government?

Tennessee government attorneys need a new card. They lost their way.

This is a new monthly column by Deborah Fisher distributed by Tennessee Press Service to Tennessee newspapers. Fisher is executive director of the Tennessee Coalition for Open Government, and her columns will explore the state of government transparency in Tennessee.


Source link

]]>
https://animalrightscafe.com/municipal-shelter-hides-files-based-on-animal-privacy-rights-opinion/feed/ 0
View from the paddock: who are the animals now? | Queensland Country Life https://animalrightscafe.com/view-from-the-paddock-who-are-the-animals-now-queensland-country-life/ https://animalrightscafe.com/view-from-the-paddock-who-are-the-animals-now-queensland-country-life/#respond Sat, 09 Oct 2021 20:00:00 +0000 https://animalrightscafe.com/view-from-the-paddock-who-are-the-animals-now-queensland-country-life/ Trent Thorne, Agribusiness Lawyer. It should come as no surprise that societies around the world have tended to prioritize humans over animals for thousands of years. This preference has been demonstrated in many so-called “moral dilemma” experiments, which are hypothetical scenarios where the subject must choose who to save and who to let perish. Research […]]]>

Trent Thorne, Agribusiness Lawyer.

It should come as no surprise that societies around the world have tended to prioritize humans over animals for thousands of years.

This preference has been demonstrated in many so-called “moral dilemma” experiments, which are hypothetical scenarios where the subject must choose who to save and who to let perish. Research shows that people consistently prioritize humans in such scenarios, even though the dilemma involves sacrificing many animals to save just one human.

Animal rights activists would argue that this is the very definition of “speciesism,” namely the idea that being human is reason enough for humans to have more moral rights than animals.

But when 61% of Australian households live with a pet, and 90% of pet owners see their dogs and cats as family (according to a 2011 survey), there’s no doubt the priorities change.

It now seems that valuing animal life over humans is no longer a marginal point of view. A recent YouGov poll in the UK found that 40% of Britons believe animal lives are worth as much as humans, compared to 49% who think human lives are worth more.

This poll is apparently highlighted in the 2021 Australian Community Report, which notes that Australians are currently the most motivated to donate money to organizations associated with medical and cancer research (the global pandemic is without no doubt a major factor in this support).

However, animal welfare support takes third place on this list, ranking above charities dedicated to disaster response, mental health, and domestic and family violence.

It has also been reported that newspaper articles on animal abuse often generate more reactions from disgruntled readers than articles on violence against humans.

The recent overwhelming response to US military service dogs potentially left behind during the Kabul evacuation was sufficient demonstration of this fact.

As much as I love animals, I find the idea that the life of a cat or a dog or a lion is as important as the life of a perverse and insulting human. I deplore the fact that my once dominant point of view is weakening day by day.

Orwell’s oft-quoted command in Animal Farm, “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” was undoubtedly a caustic political satire, but mine still.

But sadly, this sentiment increasingly appears to be a killing spree in the race for moral expansionism and the inevitable consequence of a society that rewards feelings rather than facts.

– Trent Thorne, agribusiness lawyer

MAKE NEWS:

Want to get daily news highlights delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to Queensland Country Life bulletin below.


Source link

]]>
https://animalrightscafe.com/view-from-the-paddock-who-are-the-animals-now-queensland-country-life/feed/ 0
You can criticize cockfights in Far Cry 6 without being racist https://animalrightscafe.com/you-can-criticize-cockfights-in-far-cry-6-without-being-racist/ https://animalrightscafe.com/you-can-criticize-cockfights-in-far-cry-6-without-being-racist/#respond Fri, 08 Oct 2021 14:30:00 +0000 https://animalrightscafe.com/you-can-criticize-cockfights-in-far-cry-6-without-being-racist/ Let’s do it from the start: cockfighting is cruelty to animals and sucks. And so is the American meat packaging industry that supercharges chickens and locks them in cramped cages where they can’t even move just to process them for your dinner. Now that this is settled, let’s talk about Far cry 6 and the […]]]>

Let’s do it from the start: cockfighting is cruelty to animals and sucks. And so is the American meat packaging industry that supercharges chickens and locks them in cramped cages where they can’t even move just to process them for your dinner. Now that this is settled, let’s talk about Far cry 6 and the little mini-game that could: cock fights.

If you don’t know what cockfighting is, simply put it is when people breed young roosters, or roosters, to make them fight for entertainment. It’s a centuries-old spectacle where people bet on gamecocks, and some even rig games with gnarled cruel methods like tying razor blades to their feet. I’m not here to debate the cruelty of cockfighting – that’s pretty obvious – or to endorse it. But what I’m here to do is push you – yes, you– to think about how you see it in the context of a culture where cockfighting is common.

I’m sure if you’re an American with no connection to a culture where this is common, you probably dread the mere thought of this violent hobby turned into a Tekken-esque minigame in an AAA title like Far Cry. I’ve seen a number of white Americans do just that on Twitter. Some are completely baffled by the inclusion of the mini-game. Others try to strike up conversations with bogus equivalences to compare them to dog fights, and still others are baffled that you can have an amigo (a playmate) that is a gamecock and also gives players the opportunity to participate in cockfighting.

All of them come with that distinct ring of a ‘we don’t do this here’ mentality that often defames elements of cultures abroad. Whether it’s diet specialties or traditions, Americans often stand above what they see in other cultures and, in doing so, are completely unaware that where you are geographically and culturally. can dictate how much you value certain things. For example, I’m a furry mom and would do absolutely anything for my dog, and I live in a culture that allows me to do that. But this is not the norm in all cultures. Heck, even in my own family, the idea that I would let my dog ​​sleep in my bed or even just live in the house was overdone.

Animals are not the same in all cultures, and as an animal lover it sucks to know. But it’s also something that I experienced growing up. My family also raised chicken to eat. My grandfather regularly brought home cute deer and rabbits and showed me how to skin them. And although cockfighting is not the same thing, it should be understood as something that is rooted in certain cultures, not only Latin American cultures either, but also other island cultures like Guam, the Philippines. , etc. In fact, in other countries it is not even clandestine activity as it is in the United States, but rather accepted as sporting events that take place in full view.

fc6_cockfighting_select_screen.jpg

In Mexico, the rooster fighting season runs from November to June and became a sport in the culture after farmers started raising and fighting roosters over a century ago. It’s illegal in some places like Mexico City, but often allowed in other Mexican states, mainly during regional fairs. Some states in Mexico and Baja California use cockfighting to attract American tourists. In the Philippines, cockfighting is regulated like any other gambling (or gambling) business, which allows the country to generate income.

And although cockfighting is illegal in Jamaica and Puerto Rico, that was only recently. banned in the latter when Congress made it illegal in U.S. territories after lobbying by animal rights activists– other Caribbean islands like the Dominican Republic, Cuba and Haiti all have cockfighting industries, with Haiti’s televised rooster fights rival football matches.

It is even more established in Honduras, where they have protected cockfighting (and bullfighting for that matter) from being made illegal because it is part of “national folklore”. And you should know that this protection of game comes from a law that prohibited cat and dog fights in the country. Likewise, Panama also allows cockfighting banning dog fights, animal races, bullfights – whether Spanish or Portuguese style – and circuses. Even in Indonesia, cockfighting when carried out for religious purposes is legal, although secular cockfighting and the games of chance that accompany it are illegal.

Yes, heritage is not doing something right. It does mean, however, that when discussing something as mundane as cockfighting, the conversation needs to be framed in a way that isn’t, well, racist.

Growing up I knew people who witnessed underground cockfighting, and although it has become a pop culture trope, it is based on a very real hobby. Thus, its inclusion in Far cry 6 is not only self-explanatory, but also one of the best-executed elements of satire in the game. Cockfighting is brutal, just like fighting games. By sanitizing certain items and allowing the player to choose from a list of roosters, perform moves, and hear classic announcer items, a cultural item is turned into a joke that lands for those who know it well. In fact, it’s downright smart and it doesn’t hit you. Far cry 6 don’t say “oh look at those brown people who fight roosters; Instead, it takes a cultural element, exaggerates it and puts the player straight into it. It works.

That said, it clearly doesn’t work for everyone, and that’s okay. But when the conversation turns into moral demagoguery over its inclusion, or draws parity with how most white Americans view animals (while ignoring how those huge Tyson chicken breasts were born), it becomes a value judgment no. not on cockfighting but on the people who are involved. the joke.

Like I said at the start, cockfighting is cruelty to animals, and for the most part, the people of color who chat and laugh about the online minigame bluntly admit it. However, this statement is accompanied by a “but” attached. This “but” is because we grew up with people who did, we grew up knowing it, we grew up in cultures where it was just part of life, and this cultural connection cannot. be flattened. While cockfighting isn’t “right,” a minigame that makes it a joke isn’t “wrong” – or at the very least doesn’t exist in the American cultural vacuum.

In truth, as the “talk” shifts from “bad cockfighting” to “people who like this minigame are bad,” it’s weird to be brown in this space. I assure you that the pixels on the screen are good and that the people who make jokes and love Tekken cockfighting are in the joke and not running their own operations in real life. For me, I remembered the tio sneaking up to bet on a rooster named Pequeño and how he tried to pretend he wasn’t. Others just remembered living in places where it didn’t have to be a secret. So talk about cockfighting, question its inclusion in this game, but do it knowing who you are in conversation with, because once the game is released, it is not only with the developers, but also with the players.



Kate Sánchez is a pop culture journalist and co-founder of But why Tho? A community of geeks.


Source link

]]>
https://animalrightscafe.com/you-can-criticize-cockfights-in-far-cry-6-without-being-racist/feed/ 0